What are the cartridges that you put into the forks? Im new to motorbikes so im still learning. I dont want to have to replace the entire front end.
This is a discussion on Cheap fork upgrade (pre-load and rebound adjustability). within the Ninja 650R Performance Upgrades forums, part of the Kawasaki Ninja 650R category; What are the cartridges that you put into the forks? Im new to motorbikes so im still learning. I dont want to have to replace ...
What are the cartridges that you put into the forks? Im new to motorbikes so im still learning. I dont want to have to replace the entire front end.
Welcome to the largest Kawasaki Motorcycle Forum on the web.
Registers users do not see these ads, register today - it's free!
I use GSXR 600 K1-3 or ZX6F. Basically you're tossing the useless guts of your stock forks and putting cartridges in. The even more painless upgrade is to simply install compatible 41mm cartridge fork uppers with their native guts into 650R lowers. Possibilities there are ZX6F, cbr F2 and possibly early F3. I just did a F2 upgrade for an SV rider last weekend.
Any idea if and how much longer other uppers are? I remember someone saying the ZX6E was a good 1-2" longer than the 650R upper. Important to me cause I'd love to rock clipons above the triple.
2006 EX650R
Fairing delete
Renthal Super Low bars
K5 GSXR600/750 headlight
Bikemaster LED mirrors
Yoshi TRC
Plans/WTB: Corbin seat + backrest, RSV Mille racing upper fairing, (1) bixenon projector, belly pan
I think 25-30mm. 6f are probably 20mm. Either one will work. Like the SV, dropping the front isn't a problem.
No, those ZX6s have 46mm fork tubes. It has to be a 41mm fork tube. I think any ZX6 from before 1998 or any ZZR from before 2005 will work. You basically want the legs from any ZX600E.
2006 EX650R
Fairing delete
Renthal Super Low bars
K5 GSXR600/750 headlight
Bikemaster LED mirrors
Yoshi TRC
Plans/WTB: Corbin seat + backrest, RSV Mille racing upper fairing, (1) bixenon projector, belly pan
Emulators are a total waste of money. The correct (or close) springs are a necessary prerequisite no matter which way you go. I did 3 bikes with emulators before I got smart and used cartridges. The difference is night vs day. In particular the Emulators can not address rebound. Oh sure, some people run heavy oil or weld-up the rebound holes and make the orifices tiny, or run an emulator in one fork and a rebound circuit in the other, in a desperate attempt to justify their investment in GVE, but it's a pointless exercise.
The only major caveat with cartridges is that it is non-reversible. There is a silly "damper rod oil bushing" in the bottom of the fork that has to be removed (destructively) so that the cartridge tube can pass through.
I can take "short" or normal length fork tubes and effectively lengthen them at least an inch, possibly more, since I can control how much stroke to use in the cartridge. I normally design for 120mm of travel but even maintaining that length I can 'move' the upper tube so that it's sticking out more than stock so you can mount clipons above the triples. But in general it's best to start with a longer upper tube.